Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy

If you are not involved in the search engine optimization community, January 21st, 2007 possibly held no significance for you. Nevertheless, if you are a search engine marketer or Search engine marketing, you almost certainly keep in mind January 21st as the day that Wikipedia died. To the untrained eye, Wikipedia is precisely the exact same right now as it was six months ago. We discovered bankruptcy attorney marketing by browsing Bing. To get different interpretations, consider having a gander at: go here for more info. But, once you dig under the surface and take a appear, you can see a single difference that has had an impact on the globe of search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW.

In the words of Matt Cutts, “rel=”nofollow” attribute is an effortless way for a internet site to tell search engines that the internet site cant or doesnt want to vouch for a link.” Ahead of January 21st, NOFOLLOW was primarily utilised for weblog comments. This helped weblog owners cut down on comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to denote a paid link, but this is a entire other controversy that will have to be saved for a various report.

The explanation that Wikipedias adoption of NOFOLLOW on every single single outgoing link triggered such a stir is simply because numerous individuals viewed it as the most hypocritical selection that Wikipedia could have produced. The purpose that Wikipedia has turn into so popular and performs so effectively in the SERPs is that bloggers and internet internet site owners commonly reference Wikipedia. Law Firm Marketing contains supplementary information about the inner workings of this view. When they do this, they provide a link back to Wikipedia. Get more on our affiliated site – Click here: web address. Each time that this approach happens, Wikipedia gains a little a lot more popularity in the search engines. When Wikipedia decided to implement the NOFOLLOW tag, they are telling the search engines that even though we reference a net web site and may possibly use content from it in our post, we do not want you to give it any credit. It is for this cause that several have began to view Wikipedia as a enormous hypocrisy.

Though NOFOLLOW has most likely cut down on the quantity of spam Wikipedia has to combat, but as several other folks have stated, Wikipedia could have chosen a diverse technique for fighting spam that did not punish high quality internet websites which deserve to be recognized by Wikipedia.

Comments are closed.