Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy

December 2, 2015

If you are maybe not mixed up in search engine optimization area, January 21st, 2007 probably held no meaning for you. For additional information, you may gander at: via. However, if you are a search engine marketer or SEO, you possibly remember January 21st because the time that Wikipedia died. To the inexperienced eye, Wikipedia is precisely the same today as it had been six months ago. But, when you get below the top and have a look, you is able to see one difference that’s had a direct effect on the world of internet search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW.

In the words of Matt Cutts, ‘rel=’nofollow’ credit can be an easy way for a site to tell search engines that the web site cant or doesnt want to vouch for a link.’ Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. That served weblog owners reduce comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also found in some situations to denote a link, but this really is a whole other conflict that will have to be saved for another post.

The reason why that Wikipedias adoption of NOFOLLOW on each confident link caused many individuals considered it as the most hypocritical choice that Wikipedia could have made such a stir is. The reason why that Wikipedia has become so popular and works so effectively in the SERPs is that people and web site owners commonly guide Wikipedia. When they do that, they provide a link back to Wikipedia. Every time this process occurs, Wikipedia gains a tad bit more recognition within the search engines. When Wikipedia decided to implement the NOFOLLOW tag, they’re telling the search engines that although we reference a web site and may use information from it inside our report, we don’t want you to give it any credit. To discover more, consider having a gander at: next page. It is for this reason that many have started to view being a massive hypocrisy Wikipedia.

Even though NOFOLLOW has probably cut down on the amount of spam Wikipedia has to battle, but as many others have reported, Wikipedia may have chosen another way of fighting spam that did not punish quality web sites which deserve to be acknowledged by Wikipedia..

No Comments

Comments are closed.